I grew up with a lot of male influence in my life. I have
three brothers, my mom had five, and most of them had sons. From a young age, I
was surrounded by boys all of the time. When people find out I have three
brothers, they often make comments as though they are sorry for me, that it
must have been hard growing up like that with no sisters. And I never
understood this. I love my brothers, and we get along great. I did not
understand why everybody assumed that gender was one of the defining characteristics
of a good sibling relationship. Now that I’m older, I can see that if I had a
sister, perhaps we could connect in ways where there are barriers with my
brothers. They surely have aspects of their relationships with each other that
I am not a part of. While we might work out in the garage together once in a
while, we aren’t gym buddies. And when I want to go shopping, I usually go with
my mom or a friend instead of them. But these are activity preferences. We all
act pretty similarly, and I generally don’t think about it in gendered terms.
And I think that for the most part, my parents treated my brothers and I
equally. I think that my mother, however had a more conservative upbringing
than my father, and I think that a lot of gender-specific principles were
ingrained in her. My mom was (and still is) my foremost teacher and role model
in my life. There were gender roles that seemed inherent to her that I did not
really understand, and I think that she was sometimes shocked by my behavior. I
grew to distain the word “ladylike” because it seemed synonymous with
oppression and reprimand. I think these reasons are why Jamaica Kincaid’s poem
“Girl” resonates with me. I thought it was a moving depiction of the kinds of
lessons that a girl learns from her mother, lessons about how to navigate the
world. And one of the repeated lessons was to not be a slut. I think that this
sentiment is relatable to a lot of girls, but it was very much present in my
own upbringing. In my house, we did not talk about sex, and my understanding of
sexuality was limited for a long time. I could not understand why I was not
behaving like a proper lady; I especially didn’t understand why some
“unladylike” behaviors were okay and others weren’t. I was taught to stand up
for myself; don’t be weak. But don’t lay on the couch with your legs spread
apart, even in pants, because it’s not a ladylike position. It’s ok to wear a
bathing suit, but a short skirt is for sluts. I think that most of my
inappropriate behaviors were deemed such because they did make for a proper
representation of what conservative female sexuality should look like. Like
Kincaid’s mother, these things were passed along in an attempt to make sure I
would succeed in society; as she put it, to be someone who the baker would let touch
the bread. Most of what my mother taught me has been empowering, and all of it
has been meant to help me. I hope, however, that in the future, mothers will no
longer feel the need to teach their daughters that one of the most important
qualities for success in the world is to not be a slut.
Friday, January 29, 2016
Friday, January 22, 2016
Feeding the Right Wolf
When I was reading Carl Morse’s poem, “How To Watch Your
Brother Die,” I experiences a wide range of emotions that came and went
surprisingly quickly. I think that no matter how strongly we hold an
intellectual belief, there is always a part of us that in some way reverts to
an entrenched prejudice that we have not yet drowned. Pema Chodron Wrote a book
called “Taking the Leap: Freeing Ourselves From Old Habits and Fears.” The
first chapter of the book, “Feeding the Right Wolf,” talks about mental habits and
how mindfulness can help us to overcome our entrenched ways of thinking and
create new defaults that are beneficial to life. She draws an analogy of a
river, and describes every action and thought as a drop of water. We have large
rivers that have built up over years of drop after drop being put in them, and
if we wish to change these things about ourselves, we must instead put drops in
a new river. And while we may actively prefer a newer and smaller river, it is
not helpful to deny the existence of other rivers. I think that many of us who
consider ourselves progressive individuals find it uncomfortable to acknowledge
our own prejudices if we are uncomfortable with them. As I was reading Morse’s
poem, there were times where I felt deeply sad and empathetic, but I knew that
I was making some assumptions because of prejudices that have been socialized
into me and most people in our society. I think that I often feel the desire to
ignore these and pretend I don’t feel them, and I can only assume that others
do the same. But I think that perhaps an acknowledgement of these feelings
followed by a conscious reinforcement of our intellectual beliefs would result
in us putting out drops into the right river–feeding the right wolf.
Friday, January 15, 2016
I, too, am an American.
Language is at the base of human interaction. In his book
“The Hour Between Dog and Wolf,” John Coates argues that our highly evolved
ability to move influences our thoughts, rather than the other way around. This
means that our physical functioning is inextricable from our humanity itself,
and one of the most important anatomical evolutions is that of our vocal
chords. The ability to articulate is one of the primary advantages that humans
have over other animals. Without it, we would not be able to have the same
level of complexity of thought, nor would we be able to convey these thoughts
to anyone else. Words allow us to make use of our cognitive power, and they give
us the ability to form complex and meaningful communities with other humans. In
his poem, “I Am An American,” Steve Connell labors over the power of words. He
speaks about this within the context of being an American, and as Americans, we
pride ourselves on one right in particular: our freedom of speech. Connell
takes this right and brandishes it as a weapon of extreme empowerment, begging
for accountability for the damage that it will inflict. And it is this
willingness to accept the responsibility of words that makes them so powerful.
One cannot wield a weapon effectively without acknowledging that it is
dangerous. And I do think that Connell wants to be dangerous. All artists do.
What is the point of creating if there is no room for trouble? I admire this
poem, not because of Connell’s beautifully articulated mourning of Iroquois
children, or because I agree with everything he is saying. I am moved by this
poem because he asks me to hold him accountable for his words, and that
conviction is something that I desperately want for myself. And when he asks, “If
your words don’t define you, why are you talking?” it makes me want to shut up
and think carefully before I speak again. It makes me want to be Connell’s
definition of an American.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)